Hauteville House is the house where writer Victor Hugo lived in Guernsey. Built on the heights of Saint Peter Port, Hauteville House was Hugo’s residence during his exile in Guernsey on the island.
Hugo lived in Guernsey for the last 15 years of a long 19-year exile. He was banished from France following the coup d’état by Louis Napoleon Bonaparte on 2 December 1851, and also expelled from Belgium in 1852 and from Jersey in 1855. He moved to Guernsey where he acquired Hauteville House in 1856. By owning it, Hugo ensured that he could not be expelled from the island as Guernsey law prohibits the deporting of people with property on the island.
Hugo and his wife Adèle Foucher transformed, furnished and decorated the house during his exile from 1856 to 1870, and during a return visit in the summer of 1878. He named the house “Hautville”, rather than Liberté, which had been his original intention. Many masterpieces were written here – Les Misérables, Toilers of the Sea, The Man Who Laughs, The Legend of the Ages, Le Théâtre en Liberté, and so on.
Hauteville House remained in the family until 1927, when it was donated to the City of Paris by Victor Hugo’s granddaughter Jeanne Negreponte and the children of his grandson Georges Hugo, on the occasion of the centenary of the Romantic Movement.
The house consists of four levels, with the top floor featuring a glazed lookout with a view of Saint Peter Port, Herm and Sark, and the islands near them. It is a work of art by its layout and décor, designed by Victor Hugo himself. It starts already with the entrance hall which is a transition between nature and architecture, it gives the impression of a pergola, with panoramic wallpaper covering the top of the walls and the ceiling. Furthermore, there are a tapestry room, the billiard room and the workshop, and many more rooms that are in fact a work of art in themselves. The house also houses ceramics, for example in the Tiled Hallway where the walls has been fitted with chine cabinets containing the Sèvres porcelain service given to Victor Hugo by Charles X and English imitations of Chinese porcelain dinner sets. Victor Hugo also placed ceramics on the ceiling to complete the décor. Ceramics can also be found in the dining room, which is possibly the most spectacular room in the house: its walls are decorated with Delft tiles framed by wood panelling and the ceramic double “H” of its monumental fireplace.
Further, the collection houses a large kraak-style delftware charger with ducks. Kraak-style chargers like the present example are also called Kaapsche schotels (Cape dishes), because Chinese porcelain was imported via the Cape of Good Hope route. This Kraak-style decoration enjoyed great popularity in the Netherlands, even when a larger variety of Kangxi porcelain was available at the end of the seventeenth century. Often, the chargers are painted within a hexagon or octagon with a river landscape, where large blossoming plants rise alongside the banks and little birds, ducks or peacocks strut. The border is always divided in alternating wide and narrow panels decorated with flowers and Daoist or Buddhist motifs or fortunate emblems. The Delft potters would often deviate from Asian motifs, as in the present dish where the blue color has a dark-blue, black or purple outline. The draftsmanship on Kraak-style chargers varies and determines the character and quality of the chargers.











Among its many treasures, the museum houses an impressive collection of Delftware. This collection was originally part of the Art Industry Museum. The origins of the Art Industry Museum date back to 1876, initiated by Professor Lorentz Dietrichson and antiquarian Nicolay Nicolaysen. Founded by the state, it was one of Norway’s first museums and among the earliest art industry museums in Europe. This initiative was likely driven by Norway’s desire to establish itself as an independent nation with a rich cultural identity.










Finally in the autumn of 1650, the ruling of the Court of Holland handed down to the effect that Willem could produce wares with new inventions but not in the manner of porcelain. The last judgment, that of the High Court, is not known; possibly a settlement was reached in the end. This outcome had as result that Willem Verstraeten continued making faience, but at first without the Chinese full decoration, since he had stated in several court cases that the Chinese decoration was the main characteristic of Hollandts porceleyn. Instead of the Chinese decoration he focussed on a more Italian style pattern.















